
This involves relating the instantiation of social potential
to the development of social potential in the individual. Here we see Halliday & Matthiessen’s (1999: 18)
three related histories of semogenic processes — phylogenesis, ontogenesis and
logogenesis —adapted to what might be called ‘sociogenic processes’.
On this model, the unfolding instantiation of social potential in the
situation provides material for the
development of social potential in the biological individual, which provides material for the evolution of social
potential in the species.
And, contrariwise, the evolution of social potential in the species
provides the environment for the
development of social potential in the biological individual, which provides
the environment for the unfolding instantiation of social potential in the situation.
So, to be more specific: the various instances of social potential, doing and being,
that a biological individual participates in provide material for the
development of social potential that is specific to that individual: an individuated
social potential. It follows, then, that for every biological individual,
there is an individuated cline of social instantiation …
No comments:
Post a Comment