One way to model sensing
potential, in the most general terms,
is to use Halliday & Matthiessen’s system network of mental clauses.
[Figure 5-15 in
Halliday & Matthiessen (2004: 209): Mental clause systems]
This construes mental socio-semiotic potential, least
delicately, as either higher or lower sensing and either emanating
(‘like’ type) or impinging (‘please’
type) and either specified
or unspecified phenomenalisation. That is, mental socio-semiotic
potential can be classified by these general categorial combinations.
The distinction between higher and lower sensing is the
distinction between the projecting types: cognition and desideration, and the non-projecting types: perception and emotion. We will see that it is primarily the potential to project that
makes the socio-semiotic dimension of humanity so much more complex than the
social.
No comments:
Post a Comment